|
|
One of the areas people find the most interesting about Susan is not just the length of her incarceration (presently 36 years - longer than any woman in California history) but the almost unimaginable extent of the things she has done and has accomplished over that time. In preparation for their Parole Hearings, inmates are expected to compile these accomplishments for the Parole Board. In Susan's case this amounted to an entire file box full of material - a mountain of information that was so exhaustive that merely listing the documentation without reading it into the record took over an hour during the Parole Hearing. This information has been compiled for the Parole Board and it is all material that the Parole Board is ordered by law to take into consideration when making their determinations. While the Parole Board makes a point of reading every grizzly detail of the crime into the record (and consequently across national TV) they make just the same studied point of not even mentioning the almost super-human effort Susan has shown over the last 36 years of incarceration. The list of her participation in Community Betterment programs is truly stunning, and it is appropriate that the public - those who are interested - should have not only the details of the crime available to them, but the details of the work Susan has done since, and which members of society have a right to take into account when discussing her right and her suitability for parole. The following is a rough list of some of Susan’s accomplishments while incarcerated. All of it has been compiled from Susan's Prison Central File (i.e. - all of it is documented by State employees - none of it is merely Susan's assertions, which is what makes this information such a powerful testament to Susan's work). Unfortunately, because most of Susan’s activities involve working with people informally, much of her work is not documented. Furthermore, State Officials are not required to document good behavior by inmates. Most of this documentation is done entirely at the discretion of the Correctional Staff, and is only given out in situations where the staff are particularly impressed by an inmate’s behavior. Because all of this information has been presented at Susan’s Parole Hearings it is all public record. |
|
|
1969 12-04-69 1971 6-15-71 6-17-71 6-23-71 6-25-71 6-30-71 7-12-71 7-20-71 7-21-71 7-21-71 7-22-71 8-30-71 1972 3-29-72 3-22-72 3-30-72 3-31-72 4-12-72 9-7-72 10-30-72 12-13-72 1973 3-7-73 9-4-73 9-7-73 9-7-73 1974 7-25-74 9-4-74 10-25-74 12-16-74 1975 3-21-75 4-9-75 5-8-75 5-16-75 8-18-75 9-75 9-4-75 1976 2-10-76 2-13-76 4-2-76 4-20-76 4-21-76 6-25-76 7-2-76 7-6-76 7-27-76 7-29-76 9-76 9-14-76 9-14-76 9-14-76 9-14-76 9-17-76 9-17-76 10-14-76 10-14-76 10-27-76 11-3-76 11-30-76 12-1-76 12-1-76 1977 2-1-77 3-24-77 3-31-77 3-31-77 4-6-77 4-8-77 6-16-77 7-28-77 7-28-77 7-28-77 7-28-77 7-28-77 8-3-77 8-9-77 8-30-77 9-77 10-77 10-19-77 11-1-77 11-9-77 11-19-77 1978 1-19-78 1-31-78 2-1-78 2-2-78 3-29-78 4-78 4-4-78 4-12-78 4-20-78 5-6-78 5-7-78 5-8-78 5-9-78 5-13-78 7-78 7-20-78 7-20-78 7-26-78 10-10-78 11-21-78 1979 2-1-79 3-12-79 3-15-79 4-24-79 7-79 7-6-79 7-27-79 10-22-79 11-5-79 1980 5-16-80 5-30-80 7-7-80 7-16-80 7-21-80 7-28-80 7-28-80 7-29-80 7-29-80 8-2-80 8-2-80 8-2-80 8-6-80 8-29-80 9-3-80 9-3-80 12-10-80 12-15-80 1981 1-22-81 3-12-81 3-25-81 3-25-81 4-13-81 5-26-81 6-11-81 6-17-81 6-17-81 7-10-81 8-20-81 9-16-81 9-16-81 10-29-81 10-30-81 1982 1-11-82 1-14-82 1-26-82 3-5-82 4-12-82 4-20-82 5-82 5-5-82 7-82 7-82 7-82 7-82 7-11-82 7-15-82 8-4-82 10-20-82 11-3-82 11-8-82 11-12-82 11-16-82 12-16-82 1983 1-13-83 2-1-83 4-1-83 5-3-83 6-16-83 10-13-83 12-7-83 1984 1-10-84 2-24-84 2-29-84 4-6-84 4-23-84 6-4-84 6-8-84 6-30-84 8-1-84 8-13-84 10-1-84 10-24-84 11-19-84 12-84 1985 1-15-85 2-85 2-24-85 6-15-85 6-17-85 6-27-85 7-15-85 7-21-85 9-9-85 10-17-85 10-17-85 11-18-85 11-20-85 12-2-85 12-5-85 12-13-85 12-24-85 12-31-85 1986 2-20-86 3-24-86 5-12-86 9-8-86 10-28-86 11-6-86 11-19-86 11-21-86 12-5-86 12-26-86 12-31-86 1987 1987 1-12-87 3-31-87 5-4-87 5-5-87 5-7-87 6-30-87 7-6-87 7-6-87 7-6-87 30-87 10-6-87 1988 4-14-88 7-20-88 10-4-88 10-14-88 10-18-88 11-8-88 12-1-88 12-16-88 1989 2-7-89 2-15-89 6-28-89 6-28-89 7-20-89 7-30-89 9-27-89 9-27-89 9-27-89 9-27-89 10-2-89 11-8-89 11-9-89 12-2-89 12-20-89 12-29-89 12-29-89 1990 2-18-90 3-22-90 3-28-90 3-30-90 3-30-90 4-28-90 4-28-90 6-29-90 6-29-90 6-29-90 7-26-90 7-26-90 9-22-90 9-28-90 9-28-90 10-1-90 10-19-90 10-22-90 10-22-90 10-31-90 10-31-90 10-31-90 12-7-90 12-10-90 12-20-90 1991 1-30-91 2-28-91 3-8-91 3-18-91 6-19-91 6-21-91 7-31-91 8-1-91 8-9-91 8-9-91 8-28-91 10-9-91 12-91 12-23-91 1992 3-25-92 3-28-92 6-16-92 6-30-92 7-19-92 9-10-92 11-5-92 11-12-92 12-1-92 12-7-92 12-17-92 12-31-92 1993 1-20-93 1-20-93 1-29-93 4-17-93 4-19-93 5-93 6-22-93 7-93 7-26-93 7-30-93 8-2-93 8-9-93 9-14-93 9-24-93 11-93 12-6-93 12-6-93 12-31-93 1994 2-24-94 4-18-94 6-30-94 7-20-94 8-1-94 8-31-94 9-2-94 10-1-94 10-10-94 12-31-94 1995 4-22-95 6-6-95 6-24-95 9-95 10-24-95 1996 2-96 2-9-96 3-31-96 5-2-96 5-3-96 5-29-96 6-8-96 6-25-96 6-30-96 7-3-96 7-8-96 7-12-96 7-22-96 9-30-96 11-19-96 12-96 12-4-96 12-13-96 12-26-96 12-30-96 1997 1-1-97 3-1-97 3-31-97 3-31-97 4-15-97 6-30-97 6-30-97 7-97 8-6-97 10-1-97 10-22-97 11-19-97 11-24-97 undated 1998 1-6-98 1-22-98 4-29-98 5-20-98 6-30-98 7-11-98 12-7-98 12-31-98 12-31-98 1999 1-12-99 4-14-99 4-27-99 6-30-99 6-30-99 10-18-99 10-26-99 12-16-99 12-20-99 12-27-99 12-31-99 2000 3-3-00 3-31-00 4-00 5-4-00 5-17-00 5-31-00 6-30-00 6-30-00 7-9-00 7-23-00 9-9-00 9-11-00 9-18-00 9-19-00 9-30-00 10-5-00 10-31-00 11-2-00 11-04-00 11-10-00 11-22-00 11-30-00 11-30-00 12-00 12-00 12-19-00 12-28-00 12-31-00 2001 1-01 1-5-01 1-23-01 2-15-01 3-16-01 3-31-01 4-2-01 4-11-01 4-12-01 4-18-01 5-13-01 6-30-01 7-01 7-11-01 7-16-01 8-7-01 8-29-01 9-11-01 9-21-01 11-19-01 12-01 2002 1-02 1-2-02 1-15-02 2-20-02 2-20-02 2-28-02 3-02 3-22-02 3-22-02 4-3-02 4-8-02 5-20-02 6-02 6-11-02 7-2-02 7-8-02 7-12-02 7-30-02 7-30-02 8-6-02 8-8-02 9-9-02 9-27-02 10-02 10-2-02 10-9-02 10-18-02 10-30-02 10-31-02 12-09-02 12-09-02 2003 3-03 3-03 3-19-03 5-12-03 5-21-03 7-03 7-14-03 7-14-03 12-10-03 12-10-03 12-31-03 2004 2-16-04 3-26-04 4-21-04 6-08-04 7-21-04 10-04 11-03-04 12-24-04 12-31-04 12-31-04 2005 1-3-05 1-31-05 3-24-05 3-25-05 3-30-05 3-31-05 4-5-05 12-31-05 2006 1-4-06 1-26-06 |
The head of the Los Angeles Trials Division states that Susan’s Grand Jury testimony against Charles Manson “has been vital to law enforcement.” Psychologist Dr. Fischmann states that Susan “does not tend to engage in verbal evasions, games and manipulations, and responds much more directly, frankly and sincerely [than her co-defendants].” He goes on to say that Susan has a psychological facet that “differs substantially from the features which characterize a “manson girl.” Susan achieved a good rapport, expressed sincere feelings, was ready for a cathartic confession. She showed no trace of personal hostility or personal passive aggressivity.” In her Initial Interview on Death Row, the Correctional Counselor stated Susan was “very pleasant and friendly.” Correctional Officer stated “she is adjusting well and is no problem in the unit.” Psychiatrist Dr. Coburn, in his Psychiatric Evaluation, states that Susan “was quite open regarding the instant offenses and was specifically warned of the public nature of her utterances in regard to any further prosecutions for the instant offenses. She described her involvement very openly...” She related that her codefendants react very coldly toward her, and the doctor states that her codefendants “in fact had previously admitted having less than positive feelings toward this defendant...” He ends by stating that “there is every likelihood that she will significantly change her outlook, her view of physical life and death, her relationship to society, etc. to the point where she would cease to be a danger.” Psychiatrist Dr. Hensley states that “At the present time there is no clear suicidal thinking or homicidal urges...” “I suspect that if she does decompensate she will do so quietly, will become progressively more withdrawn and uncommunicative.” Psychiatrist Dr. Roh states that Susan “remained pleasant, polite and cooperative throughout the interview. She was oriented in all three spheres and in good contact with reality.” Requested a Bible on Death Row. Chaplain Walcutt states that Susan "seems open to talking in depth and is interesting to talk with." Susan's Custodial Evaluation describes Susan as "attentive to her appearance", "usually neat and clean", Cooperative towards staff, and though she has no job assignment, she voluntarily cleans the Security Area. Deathrow WatchWoman Hunt reports that Susan “is accepting her situation here and going along with the rules.” Probation Report states that when questioned, Susan “responded eagerly,” and that “she maintained a pleasant and poised manner, even when she had definite opinions regarding what she felt...” Superintendent Carlson states that Susan “has not presented any problems...” “She appears more isolated and lonely than her two codefendants... She has more art work in her room than the other two women and has selected pictures which are both sensitive and sentimental. They are well chosen.” Correctional Counselor stated that Susan “was very emphatic and definite in her statements, and she tried to get the idea over that she will do whatever is asked of her while at the institution.” Psychologist Dr. Boylan stated that “Miss Atkins is capable of growing as a worthwhile and responsible person. She is not dangerous to herself or to others nor is she likely to evoke aggressive responses from others.” Correctional Counselor stated that the trauma that Susan endured during her childhood “all contributed to the present personality makeup...” His conclusion was that “Looking back, it is quite obvious that she was in need of therapeutic help and perhaps, if she was given some of this help in her earlier years, the sequence of events that later came about might have possibly been altered.” Psychiatrist Dr. Roh stated that Susan’s “development potential was quite substantial.” “Her violence potential was average in this institution and if released to the campus it would probably remain unchanged.” “She showed positive changes in attitude...” RGC Counseling Staff records that Susan is "more stable emotionally than when first evaluated and is cooperative." "No evidence of overt disorder of thought or affect... Positive changes in attitude. Development potential is substantial." 1972 Board Hearing - Faulted
for (Institutional behavior) - nothing
- Demands - none
Correctional Counselor stated that Susan “has been
friendly and cooperative” and that staff have made no adverse reports
about her.Vacation of Death Penalty. Letter from Susan to Superintendent Ms. Carlson, disavowing any connection with the “Manson family in or out of the institution.” Staff notes a “great deal of anti-family sentiment.” Psychiatrist Dr. Flanagan states that Susan’s occupational therapy “has proven beneficial, particularly through the positive nature of her interactions with others. She is a pleasant person with whom to work.” He also mentions that she showed insight when she stated “I’ve tried to wear everybody else’s personality. They just don’t fit. From now on, I’m just going to be me.” 1973 Board Hearing - Faulted
for (Institutional behavior) - nothing
- Demands - “Get down to ... what God
had to say about Himself.”
The Women’s Board of Terms and Parole states that,
“The Board noted that subject is “searching and that is good.” The
Board said that maybe there is a glimmer of hope for subject. The Board
offered for subject’s consideration to “get down to brass tacks and
what God had to say about Himself.” Psychiatrist Dr. Roh states that Susan “showed general improvement since the last interview.” 1974 Board Hearing - Faulted
for (Institutional behavior) - nothing
- Demands - “Persue [sic] her spiritual
interests.”
Dr. Black states, in a Chronological Therapy Session
Report, that Susan's attitude was "that of a cooperative, friendly,
verbal young woman." He also states that Susan appears to have learned
to gain what she wants by directing her positive attitude.Completed a History class through Chaffey College, receiving a “B”. Dr. Black stated that in his group therapy sessions Susan expressed legitimate concern about the emotional state of fellow prisoners. Superintendent and Classification Committee acknowledges Susan’s deliberate break from “family.” Supervisor of Education states that Susan has done “a tremendous amount of Bible study.” Dr. Black records that Susan made an emphatic statement that she does not have anything to do with the “family,” and she wants to document her dissociation with the “family” and their conflicts. He also notes that Susan "continues to be more open and apparently emotionally honest with respect to her previous association and her personal experiences." Psychiatrist Dr. Black states that Susan shows no “gross defect in her judgment...” And he concludes that “This woman has shown no tendencies to be a danger to others or to herself since her initial contact with me.” Susan’s Case manager states that “Susan is a pleasant appearing young woman, who relates to her peers with warmth and friendliness.” 1975 Board Hearing - Faulted
for (Institutional behavior) - nothing
- Demands - none
Susan is described as a “hard worker, dependable.” Susan received a Commendation Chrono for offering her time and effort to help Staff. Susan received a Commendation Chrono from Staff for the assistance she displayed by helping staff carry another inmate over to the hospital. Susan received a Commendation Chrono from Staff for volunteering to help without being asked. Susan received a Commendation Chrono for doing extra work on the Unit. Work Supervisor stated that Susan takes pride in her work and “works without supervision.” Susan received a Commendation Chrono from Staff for volunteering to clean up a health problem in the Psychiatric Treatment Unit. Program Evaluation Committee states that in the last five years, Susan “has no disciplinaries... has a good attitude, tries to get along with peers... Is respectful of staff.” Psychiatrist Dr. Flanagan, who had known Susan for 15 months, stated that Susan told him she was once antisocial in nature. “By contrast now for the first time in her life she feels patriotic to the point where she prays for her country and for those who have been elected to its administrative offices.” She states she is writing an autobiography, “By describing her own conflicts and the mistakes she has made in attempting to solve them, she hopes to provide a useful service for others. Proceeds from this book are to be donated to a nonprofit Christian organization, the New Life Foundation, which she is organizing...” He claims Susan was “expressing herself with some insight.” “She has searched for guidance and direction...” “She is substantially more consistent in her thinking and system of values and this is significant.” He concludes by stating that “A fair prognosis is offered with respect to this woman becoming a conforming member of the community.” Susan received a Commendation Chrono from Staff for volunteering to clean when the staff lost their aid. Susan’s Counselor states that “Susan is rated as a very good cottage citizen, quiet and considerate, with apparent excellent adherence to the cottage rules.” “... during the last 6 months, Susan’s programming has been heralded by significant improvement in her emotional growth.” 1976 Board Hearing - Faulted
for (Institutional behavior) - nothing
- Demands - none
Board states at Susan’s Board Hearing, that “Panel
was impressed with Susan’s sincerity and in her endeavor to carry out
her new life style, goals... Time will be the true test of her
stability.” “Board explained... that they consider her making excellent
progress...” “They were very impressed at her improvement.” Staff document that Susan shows an interest in helping peers going through emotional problems. Lieutenant stated that Susan is good at adhering to rules, has a good attitude towards staff, and is friendly with peers. In addition he comments that she “wants to help those peers who may be going through emotional problems.” Work Supervisor states that Susan is a “good worker” and that she works “without supervision.” Unit Progress Report states that Susan is enthusiastic and “takes interest in those around her.” Susan was commended by the Women’s Board for her improvement since her last hearing. Correctional Counselor stated Susan “has a pleasant attitude. She is involved with Religious work and tries to get along with everyone. ... She has no disciplinaries to date...” Occupational Therapist states that Susan is good at adhering to rules, shows a good attitude towards staff and peers, is a good worker, shows consistency in her work, always completes what she begins, and “is regarded (non-verbally) by many of the residents as a good resource person...” Staff stated that Susan was a “reliable, mature, organized young women” who presents no problems. Correctional Counselor stated that Susan “has demonstrated above-average behavior in her living unit.” He also stated that Susan “is not considered to be a custody risk ...” PEC Committee said that “Susan has demonstrated above-average behavior... does above-average work... and is not considered to be a custody risk.” They further commended her for being disciplinary free. Lieutenant Gates states that Susan is good at adhering to rules, shows a good attitude towards staff and peers, and “has been patient in the confusion over her Green Pass and program.” Work Supervisor describes Susan as “dependable and quiet...” PEC Committee states that Susan “has been disciplinary free, does well in her job assignment” and causes no problems on her unit. Work Supervisor states that Susan has ignored peer pressure and that Susan has claimed that she “may become stronger from it.” Staff documents that Susan ignores peer pressure. Superintendent, Associate Superintendent, and Correctional Counselor commend Susan for getting good reports from staff. Susan received a Commendation Chrono from Staff for volunteering to work in the kitchen during her free time to help when there was a shortage of workers. “Her cooperation and willingness to work was greatly appreciated by both staff and peers.” Chief of the BPT, Howard Way, states that Susan will be a good parole risk someday. Lieutenant states after 6 months in Susan’s housing unit, that Susan “has always conducted herself in a mature and responsible manner. She is always pleasant... and appears to be a very positive element within PTU.” Acting PTU Administrator commends Susan for being disciplinary free, showing good behavior, never abusing her privileges, improving work output, as well as her efforts in school and her housing unit. PEC Committee stated that Susan is “a source of stability on [her housing unit] for those less stable: [she] encourages women to do what is right and encourages them not to fight the system but to program and cooperate with staff and abide by the rules.” House Supervisor for Susan’s housing unit stated that “Susan has been very pleasant at all times; has done her work and can always be counted on to help where needed. Lieutenant at housing unit states that Susan is “thoughtful of others... She has not been a problem and has remained disciplinary free for quite a long period of time.” Lieutenant in her housing unit stated that Susan was “No problem. Respectful. Concerned and a stabilizing influence.” He also stated that she was no problem in supervising. Program Administrator states that Susan “is pleasant to all in her cottage, even when great stress is upon her. She is respectful towards staff and when she is wrong, will admit her error and make the necessary adjustment.” “Susan gets along well with her peers and is a stabilizing person in the cottage.” “Susan has involved herself in religious activities and appears to be sincere in her beliefs. I believe her faith has a very positive effect on her behavior. If Susan continues with this attitude and behavior demonstrated during the past year, she should be able to live a crime-free life once she is paroled and released to the community.” He also notes that Susan received no disciplinary write-ups in more than six years. Correctional Counselor stated that Susan “demonstrated good behavior... continued to make good progress during the past several months, demonstrating a good work habit and a good attitude.” 1977 Board Hearing ? - RECORDS MISSING
Susan’s Counselor states that Susan has had no 115’s
in more than six years. “She is pleasant to all in her cottage, even
when great stress is upon her. She is respectful towards staff...”
“Susan gets along well with her peers and is a stabilizer in her
cottage.” “If Susan continues with this attitude and behavior
demonstrated during the past year, she should be able to live a
crime-free life once she is paroled and released to the community.” Susan received a Commendation Chrono from Staff for helping keep the office running well. Lieutenant Arnold states that Susan has an exceptional attitude in regards to staff and that as far as her peers go, she “gets along with everyone.” He also states that Susan never has to be reminded about her work and that she “responds well to direction.” Superintendent, Associate Superintendent, and Correctional Counselor validate Susan’s reading and sharing scripture with other inmates. Susan received a Commendation Chrono for doing extra work. Susan received a Commendation Chrono from Staff for “excellent work in the PTU clerks office.” Staff stated that “Susan shows a large degree of dependability and responsibility on her job.” Susan is invited to speak at the Believer’s Fellowship of Lake Worth, FL., in response to her Book “Child of God.” The West Palm Beach Sheriff’s Department agreed to supply security for Susan. Work Supervisor states that Susan is exceptional in her skill and knowledge, as well as being exceptional in her use and care of State equipment. She also states that Susan “shows the capability of being a fine clerk and typist. She a good worker and puts in a very productive day in the office.” Lieutenant claims Susan has “above-average” adherence to rules. “Attitude toward staff: Exceptionally polite.” “Relates well with all, job performance continues to be excellent. Responds to authority and direction well. Requires little supervision...” “She also is influential in the unit in a religious vein and has been instrumental in beginning a religious group with staff supervision twice weekly. She can be a very positive stabilizer in the unit when weaker individuals need assistance.” Superintendent, Associate Superintendent, and C&PR commend Susan for receiving “very good grades” and very good “comments from her school supervisor.” Work Supervisor states that Susan “has grown in both her work assignment, accepting and handling responsibility ...” She goes on to commend Susan for “exceptional” skill and knowledge, as well as for “exceptional” quality of work and “exceptional use and care of State equipment. Lieutenant claims Susan is Above-average in adherence to rules. “Attitude towards staff: exceptionally polite.” “Attitude towards peers: Friendly with all and a stabilizer on the unit.” Stated that Susan had “continued to demonstrate consistent politeness and respect towards staff.” Susan received a Commendation Chrono from Staff for taking the initiative with another inmate to clean the entire clerks office when the work wasn’t done by the House Aide. “These women are the resident clerks and it is not their job to clean the office.” Susan received a Commendation Chrono from Staff for all the extra hours she worked to assist staff and other inmates. Susan received a Commendation Chrono from a Nurse for “her thoughtfulness and help to an other resident who was bleeding profusely. She helped me place pressure bandages on the wrist. She showed much concern and dedication to the life of an other. I think she handled the situation very well. It is good to have someone like Susan during any emergency.” Susan received a Commendation Chrono from Staff for volunteering in the Psychiatric Unit’s kitchen, as well as staying up late in the clerks office typing reports, as well as for being efficient and responsible. Psychiatrist Dr. Roh, who had known Susan for eight years, stated that Susan has “improved greatly through the eight years of incarceration in this institution as witness by the undersigned.” He also stated that she was functioning at her job “with responsibility and competence...” Susan received a Commendation Chrono from Lieutenant Magette for assisting in typing reports during a prison disturbance. Susan received a Commendation Chrono from Lieutenant Arnold for doing work “always beyond expectations,” as well as for being “respectful, polite and courteous.” Program Administrator states that he has known Susan for approximately seven years, and that “Susan has undergone dramatic changes since her arrival at CIW...” “Subject’s positive attitude and behavior are reflected by her participation program. She... continually demonstrates a cooperative and helpful attitude. ... Susan attends church services each Sunday and is currently enrolled in a bible study course on an independent study basis.” “It should be noted that subject has had no disciplinary documentation.” 1978 Board Hearing - Faulted
for (Institutional behavior) - nothing
- Demands - none
PEC as well as the Board [of Prison Terms]
acknowledged the progress Susan has made. Correctional Counselor
commended Susan for taking the Board decision with understanding, and
for presenting herself well at both the Board Hearing as well as at the
prison’s post-board hearing.Superintendent and Associate Superintendent acknowledge that Susan has no difficulties or problems related to green pass privileges. Lieutenant states that Susan is reliable and that her work is of “exceptional” quality. Correctional Counselor states that Susan’s work reports show she is “dependable, always willing to do extra work and in general, doing an outstanding job.” He also noted that when other inmates became confrontational, Susan did not respond to provocation. He also commended her for remaining disciplinary free. Lieutenant commends Susan for exceptional work quality. Occupational Therapist stated that Susan has involved herself “extensively” with all occupational therapy offered. “She requires no supervision and frequently is called upon by others for instruction and aid. Susan generally attends both O.T. sessions... though she is on an elective O.T. Program.” Susan received a Commendation Chrono from the Kitchen Supervisor for her continuous assistance. PTU Program Administrator states that Susan did not abuse privileges, staff feedback on her behavior was all positive, and that she is “usually very friendly and cooperative with her dealings with other residents and staff.” Susan’s Counselor, in his Report to the Community Release Board, states that he has known Susan for over a year and has had daily contact with her. He claims she “displays a friendly, cooperative attitude towards staff and peers alike.” “over all adjustment in PTU has been viewed as excellent.” “Prognosis... If Susan continues in her present attitude/behavior, she could function as a productive member of the community upon her release to parole.” 1979 Board Hearing - Faulted for (Institutional behavior)
- nothing
- Demands - 1) Remain disciplinary free. 2)
Continue involvement in current hobbies.
3) Remain on psychiatric referral
Correctional Counselor commended Susan for not
allowing a personal disappointment to effect her behavior and attitude.CSC Committee states that “the committee members agree that [Susan’s] behavior on [her housing unit] has been very satisfactory. She has not presented a management problem to staff, instead has been cooperative and friendly in her contacts with staff.” Occupational Therapist stated that Susan “has voluntarily assisted other residents with their personal projects. She presents herself in a quiet, mature fashion.” “Overall Susan has done an excellent job in O.T.” Occupational Therapist stated that “Susan has been doing excellent work in O.T. as usual.” Work Supervisor states Susan is good at completing her work and “displays a good attitude towards her work.” Psychiatrist Dr. Johnson states that Susan’s accounts of the crime “are essentially in agreement with the entries in [the] Central File except that she is much more critical of herself than the observers of record.” “Family stresses, conflict and trauma (largely underemphasized by [Susan]) seem to have established a basis for the Subject’s abuse and ... joining up with Charles Manson.” “...she picked up the subtler implications of “open” questions and responded with trust and a remarkable degree of self-searching.” “An indicator of the extent to which Ms. Atkins has changed in outlook, comprehension, and maturation may be her view of the position of the Board on her case. She sees the Board members [as] being in a dilemma; if they can accept the fact that she is truly changed and is an entirely different person than in 1969 to 1974... they then have the problem of sending her back to a society which still will not tolerate her because of the crime in which she participated. She reflects on this, not critically, but with an air of sympathy.” “COMMENT: In some places in the C-File are comments to the effect that “[Susan] has simply exchanged one god for another.” If intended as a criticism, this comment is illogical... Ms. Atkins has carried this further by transposing her enlightening religious experience and the preoccupation therewith, into a practical, everyday living experience. She has changed from being a blind follower to a thinking, caring person imbued with the Christian spirit.” “IMPRESSION: ...Remarkable mobilization of mental and emotional assets while incarcerated. ...shows excellent judgment, positive value system, and truly presents a transformation through finding the positive elements in the present environment. This young woman appears to have undergone a permanent change such that she would no longer constitute a danger to the community.” Susan’s Counselor states that Susan “continues to display a friendly cooperative attitude towards both staff and peers alike.” “Overall adjustment has been very good.” “Prognosis - If Susan maintains her present attitude and behavior pattern, there is no reason why she could not become a productive member of the community. The Psychiatric Evaluation Report dated 7-7-80, reports that Susan appears to have undergone a permanent change such [that] she would no longer constitute a danger to the community.” School Instructor states that Susan does “excellent work,” is an “excellent student,” and that “she was a tremendous help in assisting her fellow students.” Susan received a Commendation Chrono from Staff for voluntarily helping to strip, mop and wax all of the floors in the Psychiatric Treatment unit. Susan received a Commendation Chrono from the Music Instructor for her “healthy cheerful and positive attitude” during the 6 months she worked with him. 1980 Board Hearing - Faulted for (Institutional behavior)
- nothing
Board states that Susan’s “institutional adjustment
has improved...” and that her “disciplinary record, psychiatric
evaluations and academic efforts have shown improvement.” - Recommendations - 1) Remain disciplinary free
2) Continue participating in vocational and academic training 3) Remain on psychiatric referral, due to the nature of the commitment offense. Susan was commended “for her excellent help with the Legion of Mary...” Susan is commended by Dr. White, Chief Medical Officer. “I would like to commend Susan for helping to form and direct the Choir. Upon our approval, Susan undertook this task with enthusiasm, care and patience. She has put in many hours with the women in rehearsals, putting together song books, teaching new songs, and to the joy of all who attend Mass, we now have a Choir for Sunday Morning Mass. Thank you Susan for being an encouragement to many. Your efforts and love are appreciated.” “Susan is highly endorsed by the Legion of Mary Chair-Person...” Susan was commended by Monsignor Lawlor. “I would like to commend Susan Atkins for her charitable work and help in establishing a Choir for the Catholic Services. She was asked by the members of the Choir to help them by directing their singing.” Superintendent and Associate Superintendent state that Susan in not considered a custodial or management problem. Work Supervisor states that Susan is “a self-motivated worker and requires little supervision.” Correctional Counselor stated that “Ms. Atkins’ program participation and attitude are superior.” “She is cheerful, courteous and a mature influence on the cottage.” He also commended her for having no disciplinaries. Superintendent and Associate Superintendent state that Susan “has received commendation chronos ... for participating in education program, for doing work over and above her regular assignment, for helping in Legion of Mary, and for doing excellent work in the Occupational Therapy class.” Superintendent and Campus Manager state that Susan “has related well with her peers and staff.” And that her supervisor “indicates that her program participation and attitude are superior.” She was commended for her program response. Monsignor Lawlor stated that Susan “has worked very hard whenever we ask her to help with the Legion of Mary.” Work Supervisor states that Susan “is a conscientious and responsible worker.” “Her attitude towards and rapport with her peers is exemplary.” She also commends Susan for exceptional skill, knowledge, and work habits. Exceptional attitude towards state and her job. Exceptional quality of work, quantity of work, and care shown. Work Supervisor states that Susan “is a conscientious worker that assumes responsibility without the need for direct supervision. Susan maintains a stable and mature attitude towards her peers.” She also commends Susan for exceptional skill, knowledge, and work habits. Superintendent, Associate Superintendent, and C&PR state that Susan’s work report “shows all exceptional marks. With regards to behavior and attitude, her demeanor toward staff and other inmates is also described as excellent. She seems to be a stabilizer within [her] cottage.” Correctional Counselor stated that Susan’s work report “shows all marks as exceptional. Her behavior and attitude toward staff and other inmates is excellent. Ms. Atkins is seen as a stabilizer within the cottage.” “It is felt by this writer that Ms. Atkins has worked very hard... and has maintained herself in a more than satisfactory manner.” Monsignor Lawlor thanked Susan for her “great help to the Legion of Mary.” “...she is deeply appreciated.” Correctional Counselor Pope states that Susan’s work report shows all areas as exceptional. Psychologist Dr. Jimakas states that “From all indications, it appears that [Susan] has improved greatly from her original entry to CIW and appears very likely to continue improving.” “She expressed good insight in her processes... and showed good judgment currently.” In his testing of Susan, he states that her responses were “essentially what may be considered ...”normal”....” “Her violence potential, estimated from both the information in her Central File and her interview presentation, appears to currently be lower than the average inmate.” Superintendent and C&PR state that the staff on Susan’s housing unit consider her to be a stabilizer. Correctional Counselor stated that Susan “continues to be a stabilizer on the cottage.” And that her program continues in a positive manner. Monsignor Lawlor commended Susan, stating that “She has a pleasing personality and gets along well with her peers. When ever she is called for duty, she comes running with a smile on her face.” Susan’s Counselor states that “Miss Atkins has continued to be a stabilizing influence in her living unit. She gets along well with her peers and with custody staff. She displays a friendly, cooperative attitude. .. Her overall adjustment continues to be a positive one.” “Prognosis: This writer agrees with the report of July 1980 in that if Susan maintains her present attitude and behavior pattern there is no reason why she could not become a productive member of the community. ... Noted is the Psychological report dated June 1981 in which Dr. Jimakas states that Miss Atkins has improved greatly since her arrival at CIW and that she is continuing to improve.” 1981 Board Hearing - Faulted
for (Institutional behavior) - nothing
- Demands - 1) Remain disciplinary free. 2) Continue the education and work
program.
BPT acknowledges Susan's "gradual improvement over
the years since reception in the California Department of
Corrections"... and "Panel is also aware of improved psychological
reports in this case."3) Consider a therapy program as recommended by psychological staff. Superintendent, Associate Superintendent, and C&PR recognize Susan for receiving several commendations. Monsignor Lawlor stated that Susan “always comes with a smile on her face, and is willing to assist no matter how long it takes to get the job done. It is a pleasure to have her in the Legion of Mary and all her hard work is deeply appreciated.” Susan received a Commendation Chrono from correctional Counselor Pope to express his appreciation “for the many hours devoted to helping make Christmas a meaningful holiday at CIW.” The Associate Superintendent commended Susan for her help during Christmas, stating that Susan’s “assistance was greatly appreciated.” Correctional Counselor stated that when Susan met with difficulties, “she met it with a clear and open mind. She carefully thought out all possibilities before making any decisions.” Progress Report states that Susan is doing well as a WAC representative. Educational Instructor Griffith states that Susan showed above average effort and exceptional conduct while taking his class. Susan received a Commendation Chrono from Monsignor Lawlor her “love and devotion to our Legion [of Mary].” Susan is allowed to work in the Visiting Room’s new Children’s Center after completing 72 hours in Child Development classes. Superintendent, Associate Superintendent, and C&PR commended Susan for being the “ex-officio close custody representative for the Women’s Advisory Council (WAC), and maintaining her program in an above average way.” Educational Instructor Werner states that Susan shows exceptional conduct and cooperation. She is an “excellent student.” Education Instructor Brandon, for Creative Writing, states that Susan was made editor of the Creative Writing magazine, where she was “energetic and well-organized; as a student she was creative and productive.” Educational Instructor Shenbaum states that Susan showed exceptional effort, conduct and initiative. “She completed more than the assigned work.” “She was never absent and her attitude was excellent. Susan was a joy to work with and most helpful to others.” Educational Instructor Sullender states that Susan has a “positive attitude,” actively participates and is a “Good student.” Educational Instructor Griffith states that Susan is “a serious and motivated student,” who shows exceptional effort, conduct and cooperation. Susan received a Commendation Chrono from Staff for volunteering to clean her housing unit when the Housegirl was ill for a week. Superintendent, Associate Superintendent, and C&PR recognize Susan’s work in the prison’s visiting room Children’s Center, as well as her continued service as ex-officio representative to WAC. Monsignor Lawlor stated that Susan “has been very active in the Legion of Mary activities and is to be commended for all her hard work and volunteer efforts...” “Susan gets along well with her peers and is always willing to give a helping hand to those in need.” Counselor Brown stated that Susan’s “program has continued in a positive manner.” The Academic Education Counselor stated the Susan “is to be commended for her educational accomplishment.” He verified that Susan had received her Associate of Arts degree, completing 71 1/3 semester units, attending classes from the University of LaVerne, Chaffey Community College, Coastline Community College, and the University of California, Santa Cruz, with a GPA of better than 3.5. Susan’s Counselor states that Susan’s “overall adjustment has been productive and positive.” “This writer agrees with [the] report of September, 1981 in that if Ms. Atkins continues her present attitude and behavior pattern there is no reason why she could not become a productive member of the community.” Psychologist Dr. Arbel states that Susan shows “increased insight and motivation to improve...” She “has attempted with a considerable degree of success to improve [difficult] facets of her personality.” “She appears to have embarked, in recent years, on a constructive course and the resultant improvement is evident, and this process is expected to continue.” “...her behavior and performance in this institution has been highly regarded.” 1982 Board Hearing - Faulted for (Institutional behavior)
-
1) A
Disciplinary chrono (that doesn't appear in the File)
- Demands - 1) Remain
disciplinary free.2) Separation after marriage. 2)Continue vocational upgrading.
3)Participate in therapy when available Vocational Instructor states that Susan “seems to be a capable and promising student and is programming well...” He reports her adaptability and effort as excellent. Susan accepts appointment as WAC representative by Superintendent. Vocational Instructor states that Susan “is working hard to succeed in the program and is accomplishing the same. Susan has the ability and aptitude to be successful...” He reported her conduct, cooperation, and dependability as excellent. Monsignor Lawlor states that Susan worked very hard and “is to be commended for all her efforts in the Legion of Mary. Susan is a very warm outgoing person, and she has a lot of love and talent and she is willing to share it with others.” Vocational Instructor states that Susan’s conduct, dependability, effort and initiative are all excellent. Vocational Instructor states that Susan has been given “Supervision of the data entry and the production runs for the CIW Roster program. She is very conscientious in her work and is doing a magnificent job.” Conduct and cooperation are reported as excellent. Correctional Counselor states that Susan has “attained 1265 hours in Data Processing, and is reported as doing a magnificent job.” Vocational Instructor states that “Susan has been given the responsibility for the Data Entry and Production runs of the roster program for CIW. She is doing an above-average job, being very reliable and responsible in the work she is doing.” He also reports her conduct and initiative as excellent. Monsignor states that “Susan is very reliable and comes to [choir] rehearsals [even] when she is not feeling well...” He notes that Susan comes to Mass every Sunday, directs the Choir, and should be “commended for her good works.” Correctional Counselor Magette stated that Susan “is reported as doing an excellent job,” in Data Processing. Vocational Instructor states that Susan has made “excellent progress.” In addition to her vocational studies, he reports that she is also “working on revisions to the roster program.” Her adaptability and conduct is reported as excellent. Vocational Instructor states that Susan “has gained employable skills in the computer field.” He also reports her conduct, effort and initiative all as excellent. Susan’s Work Supervisor states that “Susan has displayed a very positive attitude and a lot of interest with her new job.” He reports that her attitude toward her fellow inmates and toward staff and supervisors was above average. Susan received a Commendation Chrono from Production Manager for “excellent performance.” He also noted that “Susan’s productivity and quality of work are definitely above average and makes her an asset to this organization.” Work Supervisor states that Susan is “making excellent progress...” Her teamwork and participation, as well as the quality of her work is all described as above average. Her effort is described as exceptional. Work Supervisor reports Susan’s effort and attitude toward staff as above average, as is her participation. Her use of equipment and interest in assigned work is described as exceptional. Dr Cotter says, in Susan's Physician's Progress Notes, that "This woman has made good use of the educational training, religious, and psychological help available to her... and has matured during her stay here." Dr. Jimakas states that during a 5-month group therapy period, she found that Susan “participated actively on all topics discussed.” “Ms. Atkins was very self-disclosing...” “She made many contributions to other group members in terms of sharing her experiences and her own difficulties. Ms. Atkins showed significant insight as well as motivation for psychotherapy. She appeared to have matured significantly and could be described as above-average in her ability to understand and take responsibility for her behaviors, feelings and their consequences. She has been placed on a waiting list for further group therapy sessions as they become available...” Superintendent Johnson and Associate Superintendent Jillson report that Susan has attained above average work reports from industry. The Catholic Chaplain states that Susan is being trained to take over as Chairperson for the Legion of Mary. He claims that “Her willingness to help the Legion of Mary maintain it’s high standard of excellence as a Self-Help Group within the Institution is greatly appreciated by everyone in the organization. She is a hard worker in her volunteer efforts and is a positive asset and influence amongst the Inmates in this organization.” Susan was a member of the Recreation Committee, volunteering to assist in planning, coordinating and modeling the campus Christmas show. Work Supervisor states that he finds Susan “to have a positive attitude toward her work.” He reports her participation and teamwork to be above average, and her attitude toward staff and the quality of her work to be exceptional. Susan begins working with staff in an attempt to organize a ALANON program at CIW - a self-help program for relatives of alcoholics. (the program didn’t work out.) Susan receives a Commendation Chrono for her assistance with the Legion of Mary. Susan received a Commendation Chrono from staff who states that “I would like to commend Inmate Atkins on the manner in which she handled herself during an Institutional Lock Down...” “she helped alleviate a great deal of stress and tension amongst her peers. She acted in a responsible manner throughout the lock-down.” “I have found Inmate Atkins to be a stable and responsible inmate, when a problem occurs on the unit and a WAC member is needed, Susan has aided this staff.” Susan receives a Certificate of Participation from Alcoholics and Narcotics Anonymous. Susan is recommended for re-election for another term as WAC representative. Susan becomes Chairperson of AA/NA. The AA Sponsor states that Susan is an active member, attends regularly, and that “Her continuous participation has helped make our AA/NA meetings successful.” Susan receives a Certificate of Participation from Alcoholics and Narcotics Anonymous. Work Supervisor states that Susan “is a concerned and responsible person with her assignment. She is capable of dealing with any problems that tend to arise in her day to day duties.” She is reported to show an above average skill and knowledge, and her teamwork is exceptional. The Production Manager of Industry states that Susan “is an asset to this operation.” He commends her on attitude, her interest in her work and the effort she displays in her assigned work. He also reports Susan’s learning ability as exceptional. Susan receives a Certificate of Participation from Alcoholics and Narcotics Anonymous. Counselor states that “Contact with subject has been minimal in this past year because she is usually able to resolve her problems herself... She programs well and has had few problems in the Unit. Unit officers have indicated to me that [Susan] is no problem and can be depended on for assistance if called upon to do so.” “Overall personal growth this past year has been very good.” Staff Psychologist stated that during the 5-months of group therapy, Susan was an active participant, showed insight, was assertive and open in the group, and shared experiences of real personal importance. Psychologist Dr. Hamner states that “considerable improvement has occurred since 1982...” Susan received a Commendation Chrono from the Senior Medical Technical Assistant, who stated that he found Susan to be a “diligent, conscientious, and caring individual as she has worked with the Medical Department Personnel on resolving various types of Medical problems that Inmates come to her with. Her manner has always been one of professional courtesy whenever I have attended a Medical Committee Meeting with the WAC members.” “Susan is to be commended for her volunteer work with the Medical Department and it is hoped that she will come back and work with the Medical Department again in the future.” Susan received a Laudatory Chrono from the Production Manager stating that, in the 18 months that he worked with Susan, he found her to be “a diligent and conscientious employee towards her assignment. I feel that Inmate Atkins is capable of handling this type of job upon her release.” He further commended her for handling the pressure from both inmates and staff on a day-to-day basis. 1985 Board Hearing - (Institutional behavior) Faulted for
-
1)
Psychological report by Dr. Hamner.
- Demands - 1) Remain disciplinary free.
2) Continue to participate in any self-help and/or therapy programs that are available to her. 3) Continue present work and vocational habits. Program Administrator notes that Susan is still chairperson of AA. The AA Sponsor states that Susan’s participation in AA has “helped to make our meetings successful.” Susan receives a Certificate of Participation from Alcoholics and Narcotics Anonymous. The AA Sponsor states that during the 14 months that Susan has acted as Executive Chairperson of AA, she participated in an active manner. “She has helped the organization to function in a positive manner.” Susan received an Award of Merit for Outstanding Achievement for showing “exceptional ability” and achieving “outstanding recognition” from the Want Institute, Group Therapy, Dr. Minion (?), Dr. Parker, Dr. Allen, and Dr. Patton. Susan receives a chrono from the AA Sponsor thanking her for her active and continuous participation in AA. Susan was Awarded a Certificate of Appreciation from the State of California for services rendered to the Women’s Advisory Council at CIW. Work Supervisor reports Susan’s attitude as exceptional. He also reports her quality and quantity of work as exceptional. The LTO Sponsor thanked Susan for her contribution to LTO’s project Para Los Ninos in Los Angeles, which handmade Christmas gifts for underprivileged children. She states that Susan’s “efforts and enthusiasm in working on the project have made is possible to achieve the goals that were set.” Vocational Instructor states that “Susan is a very bright lady...” “She adapted quickly and will continue to excel in the program.” He grades her adaptability and effort as excellent. Vocational Instructor states that “Susan brought... much brilliance to our program...” “Her attitude is good; she’s helpful to others, and she’s quite anxious to learn and apply herself fully.” He gives her straight A’s for her attitudes. Susan receives a 1st Place Award Certificate for her participation in the Women’s Summer Olympics. (no date) Program Administrator Nelson commended Susan for serving two successful terms of office with the WAC (Women’s Advisory Council), and for serving on the Medical Committee. He states that Susan’s “contribution to this organization was greatly appreciated.” Vocational Instructor Wells commends Susan for “perfecting her advanced-level skills...” and for “completing special projects for our program as well as for others throughout the institution. She is anxious to learn and to apply herself and will continue to excel in our program.” Her conduct, cooperation, dependability, effort and initiative are all reported as exceptional. Susan received a Certificate of Educational Achievement from the State of California for completion of training in Advanced Typing Review. Susan received a Laudatory Chrono from the Child Development Instructor for formatting and typing six entire sections of the statewide competency based Effective Parenting Curriculum Test. He states that Susan’s work was well done and professional, and Susan “is to be commended for her efforts.” Susan received a Certificate of Educational Achievement from the State of California for completion of training in Intermediate level word processing using the LANIER EZ-1. Vocational Supervisor states that Susan “produces high quality documents and will continue to excel...” He gives her straight A’s in conduct, attitude, and assigned work. Susan received a Certificate of Educational Achievement from the State of California for completion of training in Advanced Level Word Processing using the CPT 8500. Susan received a Certificate of Educational Achievement from the State of California for completion of training in Entry Level Word Processing using the LANIER EZ-1. Susan received a Certificate of Educational Achievement from the State of California for completion of training in Entry Level Word Processing using a PC. Vocational Instructor states that “Susan was an excellent student...” She is “fully employable. She is very bright and made an excellent addition to our class.” He gave her straight A’s in attitude and classwork. Psychologist Dr. Jamakas, after having Susan in one of his therapy groups, stated that she had “participated actively at all times and showed qualities of being a good-peer counselor to other inmates... shown continuous improvement as noted in group [by] her interpersonal communication with other group members and willing[ness] to take risks in terms of exposing her thoughts and feelings.” Work Supervisor states that Susan “handles job assignments very well [with] little or no supervision.” She reports Susan’s attitude as above average. Executive Body and Group Sponsor for LTO acknowledged Susan for her participation and enthusiasm in the Long Termer’s Organization. Susan received a Certificate of Completion for Successful Completion of three months of Dr. Parker’s Psychotherapy group. Work Supervisor states that “Susan does [an] above average job, [she] is punctual, completes assignments with minimum supervision.” He reports her attitude toward staff and her skill as above average. Counselor states that Susan “is to be commended on her active participation in AA/NA, noting her position as executive chairperson... She is further commended on her above average work reports for three different assignments, and her participation in WAC. She has attended three group therapy sessions since her last Board appearance and appears to be meeting the recommendations of the BPT. Psychiatrist Dr. Villar states that Susan’s “insight is very good and her judgment is intact.” “She has emotionally matured in regards to her outlook towards society.” “She showed a lot of remorse when talking about the details of the crime.” Psychologist Dr. Arbel states that Susan “seems to have good insight into the psychological dynamics that led her to join Manson and become so vulnerable to his manipulation and control at the outset of their encounter.” “In comparing the 1982 evaluation by this writer... there seems to be improvement in insight, less defensiveness, and her emotions are more stable.” “This behavior indicate[s] improved stability and self-discipline.” “Ms. Atkins was described as having made continuous improvement in interpersonal communication and that she has gained good insight into her psychodynamics.” “With regard to the present offense, she showed good insight about the crucial psychological circumstances that led to her involvement with the “Manson Family”.” 1988 Board Hearing - (Institutional behavior) Faulted for
-
1) Not
participating in self-help or therapy including AA/NA and one-on-one
therapy.
- Demands - 2) Failing to demonstrate evidence of positive change since incarceration. 3) Three non-discipliinary counselling chronos. 4) Psychological report. 5) Refusing to take the MMPI. 6) Exercising her right to not answer questions. 1) Remain disciplinary free.
2) Upgrade vocationally and educationally. 3) Participate in self-help and therapy programming which is made available Susan received a Certificate of Completion for Successful Completion of another three months of Dr. Parker’s Psychotherapy group. Program Administrator and Correctional Counselor state that at Post Board, Susan “requests placement in Voc Data Processing (in response to Board demands) and participation in individual psychological counseling (in response to Board demands).” “Committee notes no individual counseling is available...” Susan received a Certificate of Educational Achievement from the State of California for completion of training in Vocational Data Processing and Introduction to UNIX operating system. Vocational Instructor reports Susan’s conduct, dependability, effort and initiative as excellent. Educational Instructor Orleans commended Susan for being an “excellent student,” and for her “outstanding class participation.” Susan’s Counselor acknowledged her as an “Excellent student.” Vocational Instructor reports Susan’s conduct, dependability and effort as excellent. Susan received a Certificate of Educational Achievement from the State of California for completion of training in introduction to Basic Programming. Susan received a Certificate of Educational Achievement from the State of California for completion of training in introduction to Data Processing. Susan received a Certificate of Educational Achievement from the State of California for completion of training in Equipment Utilization. Psychiatrist Dr. Armstrong states that Susan’s insight and judgment capabilities [were] commendable.” “...her level of dangerousness appears to me less than that of the average inmate and the likelihood of her return to drug abuse also most unlikely.” Susan’s Counselor states that “She continues to excel and do above average work on her vocational and educational program. Though most of the difficulty Ms Atkins has experienced [is]... due to the fact that she has not had a chance to be more involved in self-help groups and therapy programs because of the long waiting list.” Program Administrator and Correctional Counselor commend Susan for her “excellent job on her College Education program.” Susan was thanked by an Administrator for her special “contribution to the “Gifts for Children of CIW Project.” Her gift inspired many others to contribute as well, and is greatly appreciated.” 1989 Board Hearing - (Institutional behavior) Faulted for
-
Work Supervisor reports that Susan’s conduct,
cooperation, and dependability are all excellent.1) Not
having programmed long enough.
- Demands - 2) Lack of ongoing AA/NA. 3) Limited therapy. (Therapy was not available at this time.) 4) Failing to demonstrate evidence of positive change. 5) Four disciplinary chronos since incarceration. (Only one appears in file.) 6) Several non-disciplinary counselling chornos. 7) Overall programming not of long duration. 8) 1988 psychological report (Didn’t use 1989 Psych report because it wasn’t negative.). 9) Refused to take MMPI the year before. 10) Gains are short-term. 1) Remain disciplinary free.
2) Upgrade vocationally so as to gain a certificate, and improve educational efforts. 3) Participate in self-help, specifically AA/NA and therapy when it becomes available. 4) Cooperate with psychological battery of tests such as MMPI. Susan received an A grade in Vocational Data Processing. Participated in Arts-in-Corrections’ exhibit Behind the Cover, held at the University of California, Riverside art gallery. 2-18-90 thru 3-25-90 Susan receives a Certificate of Accomplishment for completing the Breaking Barriers Seminar. [This program is meant to provide the participants with the tools and alternatives necessary for change in their lives. It prepares them to make positive choices regarding lifestyles upon re-entry into society.] Susan receives a Certificate of Educational Achievement from the State of California for completion of training in Bourne Shell Computer Language. Vocational Instructor states that Susan “is a good worker and always pleasant to those around her.” Received an A grade in Vocational Data Processing. Susan receives a Certificate of Appreciation for participating in Victim’s Services’ Children-At-Risk Walk-A-Thon. Susan receives a Certificate of Appreciation from Victim’s Services for raising the second highest amount of contributions in the Children at Risk 1990 Walk-A-Thon. Susan received a Certificate of Educational Achievement from the State of California for completion of training in introduction to COBOL. Vocational Instructor states that Susan “has been impressive in her diligence, perseverance, and knowledge of the material learned. An excellent student and a pleasure to have in class.” Received an A grade in Vocational Data Processing. Susan received an Award from CIW’s Recreation Department for Outstanding Participation. Susan received an Award from CIW’s Recreation Department for Outstanding Participation in Weight Class. Susan was awarded a Certificate of Participation in the Building a New You seminar. Vocational Instructor states that Susan “is hard working, intelligent and picks up new concepts rapidly.” Received an A grade in Vocational Data Processing. Susan received a Certificate of Educational Achievement from the State of California for completion of training in Advanced COBOL. Counselor acknowledges Susan for successfully completing 40 hours of Training for Trainers in order to become a facilitator for Breaking Barriers. Vocational Instructor states that Susan “is always hard working, intelligent, and a pleasure to have in the class.” Received an A grade in Vocational Data Processing. Susan received an Award from CIW’s Recreation Department for three months of Outstanding Participation in Weight Class (a class Susan set up). Susan received a Certificate of Educational Achievement from the State of California for completion of training in Vocational Data Processing and Computer Programming. Susan received a Certificate of Educational Achievement from the State of California for completion of training in Micro Software. Susan received a Certificate of Accomplishment for Facilitating a Breaking Barriers Seminar. Susan received a Laudatory Chrono from Reverend Johnson for helping to move the church into the new Chapel. “She has worked tirelessly and with a spirit of cooperation and enthusiasm for the two weeks that it took to make the move. She often worked twelve hours a day as well as on her days off. Her efforts went far beyond the call of duty...” Program Administrator and two Correctional Counselors state that Susan “has done an excellent job on Data Processing and [is] doing a very good job on her new assignment, working for Reverend Johnson.” Psychiatrist Dr. Armstrong stated that “Ms. Atkins appears to be well aware of her high-profile and potentially controversial status, yet she has made a deliberate and concerted effort not to refrain from undertaking a worthwhile role in the prison community.” “In other words, it is my opinion that her desire to be available to her peers in this manner constitutes evidence of her potential as a social and spiritual leader of significant merit.” Work Supervisor states that “Susan has gained my trust by her actions. She is growing at a steady pace, she uses her skills well.” “She carries a tremendous work load without complaining and is a credit to the Interfaith Chapel.” He reports her attitude, interest in assigned work, effort and teamwork all as exceptional. Susan received a Certificate of Accomplishment for Facilitating a Breaking Barriers Seminar. Susan received commendations from staff for volunteering her services on a weekly basis for assisting in the maintenance and upkeep of the facilities. Counselor acknowledges Susan’s participation in the Lifer’s Orientation meeting. Susan received a Certificate of Accomplishment for Facilitating a Breaking Barriers Seminar. Work Supervisor Reverend Johnson states that “Susan continues to be an asset and a credit to Interfaith Chapel. Her work is always done on time. She continues to grow at a steady pace and gets along well with peers and staff.” He reported her skill and knowledge as exceptional, as well as her attitude toward staff. Susan received a Certificate for completion of part of the Ed Steinkamp Ministries’ Bible Study Course. Susan received commendations from staff for her “dedication and hard work in maintaining the high level of cleanliness...” “Each Thursday she volunteers two hours of her time...” “Susan demonstrates a high degree of reliability and responsibility. Her efforts are appreciated by this writer...” Susan received a Certificate of Accomplishment for Facilitating a Breaking Barriers Seminar. Susan received a Laudatory Chrono from Chaplain Johnson stating that she “is to be commended for her time, energy, initiative, and labor in the Beautification of C.I.W. Project.” “Your efforts are appreciated Susan and are to be commended.” Susan received a Certificate of Participation from Alcoholics and Narcotics Anonymous. Work Supervisor states that “Susan does the bulk of the institutional typing [for the chapel] and assembles the Bible studies that are given out at a rate of 500 per week...” Her work habits, attitude toward peers and job, as well as her quality of work are all described as above average. He also notes that Susan’s attitude toward the State is above average. Her alertness, perseverance, and care are all reported as being exceptional. Psychologist, Dr. Grimes stated that Susan’s participation in her psychotherapy group was “active” and that Susan had matured emotionally. Susan received a Certificate of Participation from Alcoholics and Narcotics Anonymous, Codependency and Al-non. Susan received an Award from CIW Recreation Department for Outstanding Participation in Weight Class (a class which Susan set up). Psychologist, Dr. Grimes stated that Susan “Has actively participated in this group and has matured emotionally...” Susan received an Award from the CIW Recreation Department for Outstanding Participation in three months of Conditioning Class (a class which Susan set up). Susan received a Certificate of Participation from Alcoholics and Narcotics Anonymous. Susan is awarded a Certificate for successfully completing the three month AA/NA 12 Step Study Group. Susan received a Certificate of Completion for successfully completing New Beginnings Victims Impact Orientation. The Victim’s Services Representative acknowledges Susan for her participation in a four hour Victim’s Impact-New Beginnings Orientation. (chrono) Susan went on to become a facilitator in Victim’s Services’ New beginnings, going over to the Reception Center to meet with newly arrived inmates to give them orientation on the “effects of crime on victims.” And to “raise the awareness level of the criminal [to] the cost of crime to the victims.” Vocational Instructor states that Susan “is an excellent student.” “She applies herself well to accomplish her tasks.” Psychologist Dr. Klebel states that Susan “has made substantial progress during her more than 20 years of incarceration.” “The interview resulted in the conclusion that inmate Atkins has made progress in accepting her part in the perpetration of the crime, in her guilt and remorse about her crimes and in trying to understand what got her into the life style that resulted in the horrendous events of her crimes.” MMPI reflects “striving for perfection,” “test was taken in a normal fashion, there are no signs of dissimulation or defensiveness... As a matter of fact, the validity scales indicate that the tested person can be described as a “usually candid and adaptable individual...” “No deficits in judgment and insight were noted.” His conclusions were that “during observation in the institution she has significantly psychologically improved. In a less controlled environment this inmate is expected to improve further.” Susan’s Counselor states that ...”Ms. Atkins has made a positive adjustment during her (23) twenty-three years and 4 months of incarceration, and has demonstrated her efforts to improve herself and meeting the Board of Prison Terms recommendations by attending self-help groups, remaining disciplinary free and working towards becoming responsible for her actions through personal growth, self-accountability, gaining insight of her self-image and those contributing factors which led her to prison.” “This writer has been Ms. Atkins’ assigned counselor sporadically for the last (3) three years and consistently for the past two (2) years.” Vocational Instructor states that Susan “is an excellent student.” “... She applies herself well...” 1993 Board Hearing - (Institutional behavior) Faulted for
-
BPT states that Susan is doing a good job as far as
her behavior in prison. The Board states that Susan "should be
commended for being disciplinary free since 1982, for your work record,
for earning vocational certificates, and for your improvement in
substance abuse programming." They find no post-conviction behavior to
fault her for.1) Trying
to satisfy BPT demands to be perfect.
- Demands - 2) Worrying about public scrutiny. 1) Remain disciplinary free.
2) Continue to upgrade vocationally and educationally. 3) Continue participation in self-help and therapy. 4) Continue substance abuse program. Breaking Barriers Coordinator states that Susan “is to be commended for her follow-up participation as a co-facilitator for the Breaking Barriers Program...” “The Breaking Barriers Department looks forward to her continued participation.” Participated as one of the coordinators for the Children at Risk Walk-A-Thon, to raise money for underprivileged children. Victim Services Representative states that Susan’s participation in Victim Services “has been both positive and inspirational to other inmates.” This program includes “facilitation of victim impact orientations, providing input for community projects and serving as a “positive role model” for other inmates.” Dr. Grimes states that Susan “has been attending a Group Therapy for Lifers meeting,” and that Susan “has attended and actively participated in achieving the group’s goals.” “Progress towards these goals has been significant.” Victim Services Representative stated that Susan “is acknowledged for her recent participation as one of the coordinator’s [sic] for the Children-At-Risk Walk-A-Thon...” “As a result of her commitment and enthusiasm towards this special fund-raiser, the institution raised more than $8,500.00.” Dr. Grimes states that Susan “has been attending Group Psychotherapy for Lifers...” She has “attended and actively participated in the group psychotherapy process. Inmate Atkins understands the nature of her instant offense... Positive progress has been noted.” AA/NA Sponsor commended Susan for her participation as “an active member of AA/NA...” “Susan’s participation in sharing and reading has helped to make this program successful.” “The Executive Body and Group Sponsor for the Long Termers’ Organization, wish to thank Susan for her support and participation in the LTO...” “Your enthusiasm and team effort are appreciated. We look forward to your continued participation.” Prison Fellowship Sponsor states “Susan has been an active participant in the Christian 12-Steps Chemical Dependency Program...” This program “included in-depth analysis of ...dependencies and related patterns which brought her to prison. Through this study, Susan has gained insight... sharing her life experiences with her peers and community volunteers.” Executive Body and Group Sponsor for LTO “wish to thank Susan for her work at LTO” fund-raiser. “Your enthusiasm and team effort are appreciated.” Program Administrator and two Correctional Counselors commend Susan for participation in “group Psychotherapy, LTO, AA/NA, and Victims Services...” Vocational Instructor states that Susan “has acquired excellent word processing skills. The quality of her work has been excellent.” Staff Sponsor for the Chapel Choir stated that Susan “has given 100% emotionally as well as spiritually. She has been a great asset to the Spiritualette Choir.” “She is to be commended for all her efforts in accomplishing her personal goals in growing and development of personal growth.” Prison Fellowship Sponsor states “Susan has been an active participant in the Christian 12-Steps Codependency Program...” This program “included in-depth analysis of ... codependent behavior and related patterns which influenced her development. Through this study, Susan has gained insight... sharing her life experiences with her peers and community volunteers.” Susan is acknowledged for her participation in Building a New You, by Chuck Colson’s prison fellowship. A two day seminar. Work Supervisor states that Susan is “very efficient,” and that she has a “very well adjusted attitude. Good at any operation.” The Sponsor for the African American Women Prisoners Association “is proud to acknowledge inmate Atkins for her participation in AAWPA’s first “Black History” program...” “Thank you, S. Atkins for contributing to keeping the dream alive!” Catholic Chaplain acknowledges Susan for acting as a facilitator for the Christian 12-Steps Chemical Dependency Program. He states that Susan gained insight and shared her experiences not only with her peers, but with the community volunteers as well. LTO Sponsor states that she wishes “to thank Susan for her support and participation in the LTO...” “We look forward to your continued participation.” Work Supervisor states that Susan “needs little or no supervision. She shows pride in her work.” Susan is “a very neat and dedicated worker...” He also reported her attitude towards staff and supervisors as exceptional. Effort and quantity of work are also reported as exceptional. Susan received a Commendation Chrono from the Long Termers Organization Sponsor stating that “Susan, your teamwork, enthusiasm and reliability are appreciated by the sponsor and members of the Long Termers Organization.” Catholic Chaplain Fuller commended Susan for 4 months work as a facilitator in the Christian 12-Steps Codependency Program. The Chaplain noted that the goal of this program was to encourage participants to assess their codependent behavior and the patterns which influenced their development so as to gain insight and work on growth issues concerning appropriate relationships. Susan agreed to participate with the Department of the Treasury, Federal Law Enforcement Training Center, and the International Association of Chiefs of Police colloquy for Federal, State, and local law enforcement personnel on the subject of cults, after the Waco incident. Work Supervisor states that Susan “needs no supervision. She has taken time and initiative to create and landscape new gardens and flower beds for [her housing unit] in addition to her regular duties...” He reports Susan’s attitude towards supervisors as exceptional as well as her interest in her assigned work and the effort she displays. “The African American Women Prisoners Association is very proud to commend Susan Atkins for her outstanding participation as a Team Player...” “Thank you for a job well done.” Work Supervisor states that Susan “needs no supervision. She has taken time to study horticulture to enable her to maintain the gardens she created in addition to her regular duties.” Susan’s effort, interest, teamwork and quality of work are all reported as exceptional. Participated in and assisted Children at Risk Walk-A-Thon. Sergeant acknowledged Susan for her “participation and assistance for the Children-At-Risk Walk-A-Thon.” “As a result of her commitment and enthusiasm towards this special fund-raiser, the institution raised thousands of dollars for the Children’s Fund.” Work Supervisor states that Susan “needs little or no supervision. She shows pride in her work... [and] is a conscientious and dedicated worker...” Demonstrated skill, attitude toward peers, and attitude toward staff are all reported as exceptional. SOS Sponsor commends Susan for her participation, stating that “during this three month period, SOS completed eight quilts for the homeless, several baby quilts were donated to an AIDS hospice, and work continues on the “Precious Pals” for the Chino Police Department. SOS is proud of its accomplishments and it is a success because of members like Susan.” Work Supervisor states that Susan “needs little or no supervision. She shows pride in her work and is concerned about the appearance of [her work area]. She also volunteers her services in other areas...” Quality and quantity of work, as well as learning ability, are all reported as exceptional. Work Supervisor states that Susan “shows pride in her work. She is a conscientious and dedicated worker. She needs little or no supervision. She also volunteers her services in other areas in improving the appearance of the institution.” Breaking Barriers Coordinator commends Susan for her participation as a co-facilitator for Breaking Barriers. “The Breaking Barriers Department looks forward to her continued participation.” Work Supervisor states that Susan “continues to keep grounds around [her housing unit] well maintained and needs little supervision.” He also reports Susan’s attitude towards supervisors, attitude towards fellow workers, interest in assigned work, effort displayed in assigned work, and her teamwork and participation all as exceptional. Psychiatrist Dr. McDaniel states that after her arrest, Susan showed “a degree of dramatic, almost hysterical behavior, and initially she was described as close to being psychotic. ... Over the years she has matured considerably and is a far different person now when her initial reports are used for comparison.” Dr. Ponath acknowledged Susan’s participation in Group Therapy, stating that Susan “was active during group” and that Susan’s participation was showing progress in her understanding. Two Correctional Counselors state that “Since her last Subsequent Hearing on 01/29/93, Ms. Atkins has continued to display laudatory behavior.” “Despite the high notoriety of Ms. Atkins’ case, she has endured many adverse conditions and continued to exercise efforts necessary for parole consideration. In summation, Ms. Atkins has made substantial progress during her 27 years of incarceration.” Susan Served as a facilitator for the Chemical Dependency 12 Steps program for three months. "Through this study, Ms. Atkins gained insight and work[ed] on growth issues concerning appropriate relationships..." 1996 Board Hearing - (Institutional behavior) Faulted for
-
Work Supervisor states that “the skill and attention
[Susan] gives to [her work area] shows.” He reports her efforts, the
quality of her work and her skill and knowledge as exceptional, and
encourages her to “keep up the good work.”1) Getting
a non-serious disciplinary chrono.
- Demands - 2) Being accused of dropping out of Dr. Ponath’s therapy group. 1) Remain disciplinary free.
2) Upgrade educationally and vocationally “as you can.” 3) Continue participation in self-help and therapy. Facility Captain and Correctional Counselor report that Susan receives “excellent evaluations” for work. Protestant Chaplain Deshores acknowledged Susan for her participation as a facilitator for the Chemical Dependency 12-Steps Group. This group is meant to allow inmates to assess their chemical dependent behavior and the related patterns which influence their development. “Through this study, Susan has gained insight and worked on growth issues concerning appropriate relationships...” Susan receives recognition for co-facilitating Prison Fellowship’s Christian 12-step for Overcoming Chemical Dependency. LTO Sponsor commended Susan for her volunteer work in single-handedly restoring the gardens and lawns around the visiting facilities. He states that Susan “spent many hours of her free time in this effort and made a significant change by beautifying the appearance of the area, which now has flower beds and green grass, thereby, making it a pleasant experience for visitors. Thank you, Susan, for all the time and care you have devoted to this project.” Work Supervisor states that Susan continues “to do good work and have a positive attitude.” Her participation, teamwork, quality of work, attitude towards staff, supervisors, and fellow workers are all described as exceptional. Protestant Chaplain Deshores acknowledged Susan for acting as a Facilitator in the Codependency 12-Steps Group. This group helped inmates to re-assess their behaviors and gain insight. Prison Fellowship Ministries International commended Susan for her personal contribution to developing a series of questions to go along with their 12-step programs. The PFMI Class Instructor, Area Director, and Area Council state that “Susan Atkins has been the principle author and composer of these questions for each of the 14 sessions of the co-dependency program and has now started the 12 step drug dependency program. ...she has spent about 2 1/2 months so far in the development of these questions. She is to be commended for her willingness, ability and insightfulness into the dynamics of what can help a person deal with their co-dependency problems and overcome their dependency upon drugs in order to produce these questions that can be used with the workbook provided by Prison Fellowship.” Susan receives a Certificate of Participation for her work with the AA/NA Banquet entertainment. Dr. Ponath states that during her lifers general process group sessions, Susan “maintained an ac |